home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Monster Media 1994 #2
/
Monster Media No. 2 (Monster Media)(1994).ISO
/
text
/
dl_21st.zip
/
NY-0494.TXT
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-05-07
|
15KB
|
267 lines
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. His Holiness the Dalai Lama's speech in New York, April 1994
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forwarded by: International Campaign for Tibet <ict@igc.apc.org>
By His Holiness the 14th Dalai Lama
Reflections on the Challenges of the 21st Century
[Speech delivered to New York Lawyers Alliance for World Security
and the Council on Foreign Relations]
New York City April 27, 1994
As the twentieth century draws to a close, we find that
the world has grown smaller. The world's people have
become almost one community. Political and military
alliances have created large multinational groups;
industry and international trade have produced a global
economy. Worldwide communications are eliminating ancient
barriers of distance, language and race. We are also
being drawn together by the grave problems we face:
overpopulation, dwindling natural resources, degradation
of the environment, military build-up and aggression and
terrible human rights situations.
I believe that to meet the challenge of the next century,
human beings will have to develop a greater sense of
universal responsibility. Each of us must learn to work
not just for his or her own self, family or nation, but
for the benefit of all mankind. It is very old fashioned
to think in terms of my nation, or my country. Universal
responsibility is the real key to human survival.
Whether we like it or not, we have all been born on this
earth as part of one great family. Rich or poor, educated
or uneducated, black, white or yellow, belonging to one
nation, religion, ideology or another, ultimately each of
us is just a human being like everyone else. We have the
common human needs and concerns. We all seek happiness
and try to avoid suffering regardless of our race,
religion, sex or political status. Human beings, indeed
all sentient beings, have the right to pursue happiness
and live in peace and in freedom.
As free human beings we can use our unique intelligence
and try to understand ourselves and our world. But if we
are prevented from using our creative potential, we are
deprived of one of the basic characteristics of a human
being. It is often the most gifted, dedicated and
creative members of our society who become victims of
human rights abuses. Thus the political, social, cultural
and economic developments of a society are obstructed by
the violations of human rights. Therefore, the protection
of these rights and freedoms are of immense importance
both for the individuals affected and for the development
of the society as a whole.
If we accept that others have an equal right to peace and
happiness as ourselves do we not have a responsibility to
help those in need? Respect for fundamental human rights
is as important to the people of Africa and Asia as it is
to those in Europe or the Americas. All human beings,
whatever their cultural or historical background suffer
when they are intimidated, imprisoned or tortured. The
question of human rights is so fundamentally important
that there should be no difference of views on this. We
must therefore insist on a global consensus not only on
the need to respect human rights world wide, but also on
the definition of these rights.
Some governments have contended that the standards of
human rights laid down in the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights are those advocated by the West and cannot be
applied to Asia and other parts of the Third World because
of differences in culture and differences in social and
economic development. I do not share this view and I am
convinced that the majority of Asian people do not support
this view either, for it is the inherent nature of all
human beings to yearn for freedom, equality and dignity
and they have an equal right to achieve that.
I do not see any contradiction between the need for
economic development and the need for respect of human
rights. The rich diversity of cultures and religions
should help to strengthen the fundamental human rights in
all communities. Underlying this diversity are
fundamental human principles that bind all us all as
members of the same human family. Diversity and
traditions can never justify the violations of human
rights. Thus discrimination of persons from a different
race, of women, and of weaker sections of the society may
be traditional in some regions, but if they are
inconsistent with universally recognized human rights,
these forms of behavior should change. The universal
principles of equality of all human beings must take
precedence.
Artificial barriers that have divided nations and peoples
have fallen in recent times. With the dismantling of the
Berlin Wall, the East - West division which has polarized
the whole world for decades has now come to an end. We
are experiencing a time filled with hope and expectations.
Yet there still remains a major gulf at the heart of the
human family. By this I am referring to the North South
divide. If we are serious in our commitment to the
fundamental principles of equality, principles which I
believe lie at the heart of the concept of human rights,
today's economic disparity can no longer be ignored. It
is not enough to merely state that all human beings must
enjoy equal dignity. This must be translated into action.
We have a responsibility to find ways to reduce this gap.
In this context, another important issue is
over-population. From a Buddhist point of view, life of
every sentient being is precious, and birth control is not
favored. But today, we are facing a situation where the
growing number of people poses a threat to the survival of
humanity. Therefor, I personally feel we need to be
pragmatic and adopt birth control measures in order to
ensure the quality of life today in southern countries,
and protect the quality of life for future generations.
Of course, as a Buddhist monk, I favor non-violent forms
of birth control.
Another issue which is very dear to my vision of the
future is global demilitarization. This may sound
idealistic to many people. I am aware that it needs a
process of rethinking, education and a step by step
approach. Most important I believe, is to re-evaluate our
concept of military establishment. National forces should
be gradually dissolved and collective forces on a regional
basis should be formed. An important further step toward
the goal of global demilitarization is an international
ban on arms trade and the expansion of demilitarized zones
in all parts of the world. Recent progress on dismantling
nuclear arsenals and nuclear test bans are encouraging and
significant developments.
Many dictators in the developing world have survived by
weapons and armaments supplied by northern countries. So
much money has gone towards buying guns instead of feeding
people and meeting basic human and environmental needs.
Costa Rica, a country which has followed the demilitarized
path, has done quite well in areas such as education and
health compared to neighboring countries. On the other
hand, take Somalia for example, it is such a tragedy that
there is no shortage of guns and bullets, but a severe
lack of food. In such situations, thousands of innocent
people can die, including many innocent children.
Even in your own country, guns and violence are too
prevalent. And it seems that a contributing factor is
the availability of inexpensive automatic weapons sold to
American consumers by companies owned by the Peoples
Liberation Army. Those cheap weapons are not only harming
Americans, but also financially contributing to the army
repressing my people in Tibet.
I have always envisioned the future of my own country,
Tibet, as a neutral, demilitarized sanctuary where weapons
are forbidden and the people live in harmony with nature.
I have called this a Zone of Ahimsa or non-violence. This
is not merely a dream -- it is precisely the way Tibetans
tried to live for over a thousand years before our country
was tragically invaded. Also, for at least the last three
hundred years, we had virtually no army. Tibet gave up
the waging of war as an instrument of national policy
several centuries ago.
I would also like to express my deep sense of satisfaction
that elections are taking place in South Africa that allow
all South Africans to participate. I hope and pray that
peoples of all backgrounds and leaders of all communities
will continue to work together towards an open, democratic
society. I also had the opportunity to visit Israel
recently, and there too, I was very heartened to see a
process of negotiations towards a peaceful solution. Both
these conflicts are being resolved through personal,
face-to-face dialogue which I have always believed is
essential.
Unfortunately, my efforts to resolve the situation in
Tibet have not been as successful. So far, we have not
been able to make a breakthrough and establish direct
talks.
It has been thirty five years since the Chinese took
complete control of Tibet. At that time, I , along with
over 100,000 fellow Tibetans, left my homeland to live in
exile in India, Nepal and other parts of the globe. As a
result of the invasion and the ensuing occupation over 1.2
million of our people died of unnatural causes. Most of
our monasteries, the learning centers and repositories of
our culture-- over 6000 of them-- have been destroyed.
Since that time I have pursued a cause of non-violence and
have tried in every way I know to find some reasonable
accommodation with the Chinese government so that the
Tibetan people can resume a life in peace and with
dignity.
In 1979, Deng Xiaoping stated that all issues regarding
Tibet were open for negotiations-- except that of
independence. I responded positively in agreement with
the principles advanced by Mr. Deng Xiaoping with the hope
that the Chinese government would be genuinely committed
to negotiate on all other matters concerning the future of
the six million Tibetans.
After informing the Chinese of my position on this point,
through my emissaries who traveled to Beijing and met with
Chinese diplomats abroad as well as through some of our
foreign friends, I was hopeful that a forthright response
would come from the Chinese so that we could enter into
serious negotiations. My decision to make a short trip to
Tibet in 1991 would have also given the Chinese government
an opportunity to arrange direct meetings between me and
some of their senior leaders who could have come to Tibet
to meet me.
Unfortunately the Chinese government has yet to accept any
of my proposals over the last fourteen years and has yet
to enter into substantive negotiations with my
representatives, who remain prepared to meet with Chinese
representatives anytime.
Therefore, I take this opportunity to again state my
willingness to meet with any of the present members of the
Standing Committee of the Politburo in a third country of
mutual convenience with the sincere desire to make a
breakthrough in our relationship.
On my part I am continuing with my sincere efforts to
resolve the situation through negotiations. If this
approach does not bring about a positive result, then I
must consult my people over our future course of our
freedom struggle. However, my commitment to non-violence
is fundamental and there will be no deviation from this
path under my leadership.
I think we can say that, because of the lessons we have
begun to learn, the next century will be friendlier, more
harmonious and peaceful. I am very hopeful. At the same
time, I believe that every individual has a responsibility
to help guide our global family in the right direction.
Good wishes are not enough; we have to assume
responsibility. Large human movements spring from
individual initiatives. I therefore believe strongly that
it is the individual who makes the difference.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
excerpted from:
------------------------ World Tibet Network News ----------------------
Published by: The Canada-Tibet Committee
Editorial Board: Brian Given <bgiven@ccs.carleton.ca>
Nima Dorjee <amnesty@acs.ucalgary.ca>
Conrad Richter <conradr@utcc.utoronto.ca>
Tseten Samdup <tibetlondon@gn.apc.org>
Submissions and subscriptions to:
wtn-editors@utcc.utoronto.ca
or fax to: +44-71-722-0362 (U.K.)
Send us your comments, announcements, news or items for discussion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ISSUE ID: 94/05/03 20:30 GMT Compiled by Nima Dorjee